Now. Enough with the bitching. I'm seriously intruded by the thought that there are no, and i mean no, columns about Sex and it's curiosities written by men. I'm pretty sure there must be some whorefest anecdotes in some random gay dudes livejournals. But a real insight? Something that would speak openly about random acts of sluttyness, the insertion of several vibrating kitchen utensil into male anusses ( anus?plural? ) ?
None
Not that i'd know of anyway.
What does that mean? And why is that so?
Well firstly I think it means that women have become the sluts of our generation. whey! sexual revolution!
As i've been watching The Tudors religiously over the past for weeks ( I miss you, first Queen..or actually second. The slutty one. I don't remember your name but you rocked. ) I have come to the conclusion that men used to be the whores.
As The Tudors is currently my only form of self-education ( I've given up on getting books from the library. I never return them in time. And i mean never. Ever. It costs me horrendous amounts of money on late fees from which I could buy the real thing. But i don't work that way. If I had that money I would spend it on Starbucks. Or loose it in the streets. Or just hand it back to the friendly librarians at the Bedford Village library. ) well, where was I? Yes. The Tudors being my only form of education. I've learned several things from that show:
a) Men were whores in those days
b) Men were all secretly gay in those days
c) If a lady was a whore she'd get her head cut off.
Which i think can result in only two things : For the next six hundred years sluttery by women would be distinctly handled with pointing fingers and throwing rocks and also ( the inevitable ) men wouldn't stop whoring around.
Skip that to now. Everything i read that has anything remotely to do with sex on the internet ( apart from youporn.com and even there it seems Liz and Kelly are getting it on much more than Joe. ) is written by (yes! ) women!
How come if men are supposed to stick their dix where they can? I've come up with a simple train of thought so far: In order for all those manwhores to exist there has to be an equal amount of women atleast to participate in the whole stint ( Not that masturbating isn't fun. But it doesn't lead to whoredom ) .Because if the same guy has sex with the same girl all the tie we call that fuckbuddies ( or some refer to the term "relationship" . A concept i don't neccessarily grasp just yet ) ...Unless b) applies of course .
If you ( or me, in that case. What with all the time saving I do by not reading books these days ) think about it you actually need more women to be whores than men in order to keep the circle alive. If you have one manwhore you need atleast 50 women ( seperately or all at the same time. Comes down to the same. ) for that one guy to be considered a whore (that is because Whoredome rises potentially slower for men than for women for some reason. It's a mathematical mystery nobody has yet figured out.I'm on it. ) .
That's fifty women people. Fifty women who sleep with a random guy they can't know for too long or too well because hey, that dude is pretty busy banging all those female walking genitalia.
Fifty women promiscious enough to sleep with atleast one of those notorious Manwhores we all know atleast one of ( Hi John! ).
That's a whole lotta whores if you ask me. And i mean that in the most non-degrading way possible (I'm one of them ) .
